Skip to main content

Chaitanya Tamhane's 'Court' and Christopher Nolan's 'Interstellar': A Study of 'Theme-Based' Filmmaking


Couple of days ago, in the space of 6 hrs, I watched Chaitanya Tamhane's 'Court' and Christopher Nolan's 'Interstellar' back to back. The one element that's common to the making of both these 'powerful' film is that they both are directed by young, enterprising filmmakers who challenge the conventional wisdom of their respective film-fraternity. 'Court' is the debut feature film of Director Chaitanya Tamhane and this film has been loved the world over by prominent film critics. American publications such as 'Variety', 'The Hollywood Reporter' and 'New York Post' have praised the mockumentary style of film-making inhibited by Chaitanya for 'Court' and it's indeed a slow-burning film which at two-hour length will make you feel more uncomfortable than pleasant. It discusses a 'petty' court case throughout its course and in-between you will find instances that make you both wince and wink. But If you would like me to call it an entertaining film, I would not for I waited and waited for some hardcore action (such moments are a must-have characteristic for hard-hitting films like "Court') but I didn't find my eureka moment. This film is certainly disturbing, it would make you feel very uncomfortable and I got it after watching it why it's been praised so effusively by Western Media for 'Court' reminded them of the golden era of Hollywood (that's 60s) where Hollywood churned out theme-based movies with a consistent efficiency. This would help us understand why 'Court' was pitched so fervently and ultimately chosen for India's official nomination for Oscars.

I cannot forget the euphoria created by 'Interstellar' release. Christopher Nolan must have experienced the same high with 'The Dark Knight Rises' release. Fans' sentiments have always been very strong for Nolan's films and there is a reason behind it. Fans know that finally they have got a filmmaker that has not only got major-studios' backing for his 100 million dollar movies but also audience support by making 'intelligent' films that test and challenge their knowledge level. People are still knocking themselves out over Inception's ending. Only Steven Spielberg before Nolan was able to come up with such innovative, brilliant ideas for his summer blockbusters. 'Minority Report and Close Encounters of Third Kind' are two of the finest neo-noir science fictions that Hollywood has come out so far and even 'Gravity' and now 'Interstellar' couldn't manage to topple them. Like the 'The Dark Knight Rises', Interstellar too was bogged down with two many ambiguous ideas and we are not even counting the many technical cliches that Interstellar exhibited. The concepts of 'Tesseract', 'Wormhole', '5-D', 'Interplanetary Life', 'Super-massive Black Hole', 'Gravity', 'Dilated Time', 'Morse Code' and 'Interstellar' were too much to stomach down for not only critics and fans but even for many theoretical physicists. Still, it managed to score with audience the world over and minted more than USD 675 Million on Box-Office. The reason: it had a very strong family theme and one scene was particularly amazing where Matthew Mcconaughey's character up over in the stars watch his children age more than 23 years in the space of 3 hrs of 'space exploration' and couldn't manage to hold over his tears which flow effortlessly from his eyes. He feels helpless but a strong yearning of meeting his beloved daughter again make him break all the scientific barriers which at a time seemed unbelievably impossible. That's the film-making of highest imaginable quality.

So as we see here, themes are an important aspect of film-making and from where I see it, Both 'Court' and 'Interstellar' manage to find one and make it 'graceful'. No doubt, audiences and critics graced them too.............#IAmDone..........#NakedEmotions

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Leftovers: A Very 'Special' HBO Production

Three things that have occupied my mind for last three days in descending order of importance are: Justin Trudeau, Heinrich Klassen and The Leftovers. I am going to write here about the least important entity for I am likely to forget about it most urgently. The Leftovers is an HBO production and like the most HBO productions, it makes for a great television experience. I chose to watch it for two reasons: First, it was only three season long with 28 episodes in total and secondly, for two years running, it was the best TV show in American Landscape. There was a third reason as well and it was in the name of its creator's promise. Damon Lindelof is one of the brightest American minds and he gave us 'Lost' all those years back. I have been a huge fan of 'Lost' and till this time, gush about its fantastical and mythical elements. People still find it very hard to crack the mysteries of Lost and when a show leaves you with more questions than the answers after its 8

Phillip Seymour Hoffman : An Obituary

Phillip Seymour Hoffman was one of the modern acting greats. You can always identify and isolate him in an ensemble cast. Give him just two-three lines in a 150-180 minutes long feature film and still he would enthrall the audience with his magic and aura and come out on top. People and critics alike bestowed countless superlatives upon him in a career spanning over more than two decades but whether any one of those adjectives ever managed to justify his cinematic craft, I seriously doubted. He was unprecedented and unsurpassed in the practice of cinematic artistry and thus emerged as America’s greatest character actor ever, period. Paul Giamatti is his worthy successor and hopefully he would calm and soothe our nerves with his finest performances in times to come in Phillip’s absence. Phillip ultimately was a show-stealer, a rabble-rouser, an aloof but a sympathizing marvelous human being who marveled in Hollywood though always residing at its sidelines. I first saw him playing a y

Book Review: Unanswered

'Unanswered' is a book penned by Mr. Kunal Uniyal and it's his third book. I am calling it a book, using a common noun to describe it and I have a good enough reason for doing so. It's a book that consists off both poems and prose and I was in real dilemma picturing its prognosis in my mind. It started with a poem named 'You and I' and beautiful it was, all poised and lyrical. And then came a snippet of a prose by the name 'Life of a Yogi'. They were really not connected and I was perplexed. Then I allowed myself some comfort and decided to dig up some more. Some more beautiful poems and accompanying yet again not quite related passages of prose followed but now they looked more in shape and very much in order. Now I was beginning to realize that there was more to this book than met my eyes earlier and it's scope is much wider that what I originally thought. You are required to engage yourself with this book and once you do that, you will know you ar