Skip to main content

Sunil Gavaskar's Biasness against Cheteshwar Pujara

I watched Pujara today grinding out an innings in the middle of SSC in Colombo. True grit and defiance was on display and these things don't look beautiful on Television. But their importance doesn't very often lose on the team's fate. Well these were the same traits that made Dravid, The Wall and a bona fide legend of Indian Cricket.

But there is a different side of this story too. To the Aesthetics of test match cricket, Pujara was doing exceptionally well but what about the other personnel whose intentions are derived and driven by money only? Sunny Gavaskar is one such person. I have been watching his stance on Pujara's selection and game-play from the very start of this series. He has called him 'inconsistent', 'technically deficient' and a 'one gear only batsman'. In his books, Rohit Sharma presents a much more solid case. We shall not talk about Rohit Sharma here. That would be a serious waste of my Facebook wall's precious space. So Pujara while playing one of the his most important innings in Indian jersey is still being criticized by Mr. Gavaskar despite reaching a fifty. Russel Arnold, that ever-snubbing and partial cricketer-turned-commentator, too seems charmed by Pujara's technique and defiance and so is Jonty Rohdes and Sanjay Manjeraker. But Gavaskar isn't impressed. He declares while talking to Sanjay and Jonty that if Pujara wants to cement his place in Indian test team, he needed to come up with a 100 (at least), 150 or even a 200. Only then he shall be able to claim a rightful place in the team.

Sunny Gavaskar, ladies and gentlemen, is not oblivious to history and Pujara's more-than-impressive stats. He knows them all, by heart. But he has been blinded by BCCI's money and power. He has been parroting what BCCI wants him to parrot in foreign commentary studio on its behalf. If you happen to watch this match today, you can see struggle written all over Indian batsmen's faces. They are struggling to get their bats to the ball. In the morning spell, Dhammika Prasad bowled at least 20 balls that could have taken a wicket at any moment yet still, Sunny wants Pujara to make a 200+ score. Colombo SSC happens to be a place where Sri Lankans haven't lost a test match since 2004 and yet, Gavaskar wants Pujara to make a double hundred.That's outrageous and wishful thinking, though Pujara is still hanging there on 135. I shall pray to God that he goes on and on and on. God only knows How much Indian cricket needs him to do well.

And as far as Gavaskar's comments are concerned, I shall wish that may God free him from BCCI's duties (read liabilities) as soon as possible so that he gets to speak his mind as often and freely as he can, just like some few odd years ago. We want the OLD Gavaskar back but this parroting one won't work at any cost......‪#‎ShameOnYouSunny‬........‪#‎NakedEmotions‬

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

P.S. Hoffman & Joaquin Phoenix: The Master

My infatuation with the movies is well known but my involvement with the actors and their characters is even more heartwarming. There are innumerable movies that I saw simply because they featured my favorite actors, however they themselves were not great. Examples could be infinite, however for the sake of this article I'll have to produce something here. Anger Management for Jack Nicholson (boy, isn't he a legend?), Swing Vote for Kevin Costner, Snatch for Brad Pitt, Legends of the Fall (Brad Pitt), Leon: The Professional, Immortal Beloved, Bram Stroker's Dracula, State of Grace & Prick up your ears; all for Gary Oldman (mind you, he is a chameleon). Meanwhile, I started accumulating some of the finest performances by some of the legendary actors of all time. Very recently, as anyone who follows me regularly knows, I grew very much fond of the craft and artistry of Daniel Day-Lewis. He is a fine, fine actor whose study and impersonation of a character is often pictur...

Love and Friendship

Friendship is an aspect of life that’s not controlled by its beholders. Ideal friendships, well they are the things of past now. Many a times we have seen our parents or their parents talking about their old great friends and how amusingly they tell us about their bonding, the moments they spent together and we see a ‘priceless’ twinkle in their eyes…..that’s something which is missing from modern friendships. There are terms & phrases like ‘yaar tu to apna bhai hai’, ‘yaar tu to ghar ka aadmi hai’ which even today invoke something very beautiful inside our hearts but we all know that the feelings underneath them are ‘hollow’, they are just mere words, ‘emotionless’ and ‘impassive’. Well who am I to comment on such an indefinable ‘qualitative’ perspective? I’m one of you, those wretched creatures that are still in need of true, great friendships. Well I certainly can’t say that I haven’t got friends. I’ve got friends, plenty of them in fact, and some of them are real great. I s...

Film Essay: Kill Bill Vol 1 & 2

It must be said that when I became routinely aware of the existence of Hollywood films, the one name that always crossed my path and eyes was 'Kill Bill'. It wasn't very hard to guess it's genre from its poster...Uma Thurman in a yellow spandex suit with a 'killer-looking' sword were very much indicating that it was an action film and we Indians LOVE action picchhers . But I wouldn't watch it, not until a week ago and the reason was that I never quite liked those 'action picchers'. It's very UnIndian to say but I was always more into 'Drama' and other genres of movies that unsurprisingly brought me to Hollywood and World Cinema doors. And Kill Bill I had to watch it because of two people that I respect and admire very much from movie fraternity, viz. Martin Scorsese and Roger Ebert. As much as these two people were fond of each other, I was doubly in awe of them. One a master filmmaker and other, the most popular film critic of the world....