Skip to main content

Sunil Gavaskar's Biasness against Cheteshwar Pujara

I watched Pujara today grinding out an innings in the middle of SSC in Colombo. True grit and defiance was on display and these things don't look beautiful on Television. But their importance doesn't very often lose on the team's fate. Well these were the same traits that made Dravid, The Wall and a bona fide legend of Indian Cricket.

But there is a different side of this story too. To the Aesthetics of test match cricket, Pujara was doing exceptionally well but what about the other personnel whose intentions are derived and driven by money only? Sunny Gavaskar is one such person. I have been watching his stance on Pujara's selection and game-play from the very start of this series. He has called him 'inconsistent', 'technically deficient' and a 'one gear only batsman'. In his books, Rohit Sharma presents a much more solid case. We shall not talk about Rohit Sharma here. That would be a serious waste of my Facebook wall's precious space. So Pujara while playing one of the his most important innings in Indian jersey is still being criticized by Mr. Gavaskar despite reaching a fifty. Russel Arnold, that ever-snubbing and partial cricketer-turned-commentator, too seems charmed by Pujara's technique and defiance and so is Jonty Rohdes and Sanjay Manjeraker. But Gavaskar isn't impressed. He declares while talking to Sanjay and Jonty that if Pujara wants to cement his place in Indian test team, he needed to come up with a 100 (at least), 150 or even a 200. Only then he shall be able to claim a rightful place in the team.

Sunny Gavaskar, ladies and gentlemen, is not oblivious to history and Pujara's more-than-impressive stats. He knows them all, by heart. But he has been blinded by BCCI's money and power. He has been parroting what BCCI wants him to parrot in foreign commentary studio on its behalf. If you happen to watch this match today, you can see struggle written all over Indian batsmen's faces. They are struggling to get their bats to the ball. In the morning spell, Dhammika Prasad bowled at least 20 balls that could have taken a wicket at any moment yet still, Sunny wants Pujara to make a 200+ score. Colombo SSC happens to be a place where Sri Lankans haven't lost a test match since 2004 and yet, Gavaskar wants Pujara to make a double hundred.That's outrageous and wishful thinking, though Pujara is still hanging there on 135. I shall pray to God that he goes on and on and on. God only knows How much Indian cricket needs him to do well.

And as far as Gavaskar's comments are concerned, I shall wish that may God free him from BCCI's duties (read liabilities) as soon as possible so that he gets to speak his mind as often and freely as he can, just like some few odd years ago. We want the OLD Gavaskar back but this parroting one won't work at any cost......‪#‎ShameOnYouSunny‬........‪#‎NakedEmotions‬

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Leftovers: A Very 'Special' HBO Production

Three things that have occupied my mind for last three days in descending order of importance are: Justin Trudeau, Heinrich Klassen and The Leftovers. I am going to write here about the least important entity for I am likely to forget about it most urgently. The Leftovers is an HBO production and like the most HBO productions, it makes for a great television experience. I chose to watch it for two reasons: First, it was only three season long with 28 episodes in total and secondly, for two years running, it was the best TV show in American Landscape. There was a third reason as well and it was in the name of its creator's promise. Damon Lindelof is one of the brightest American minds and he gave us 'Lost' all those years back. I have been a huge fan of 'Lost' and till this time, gush about its fantastical and mythical elements. People still find it very hard to crack the mysteries of Lost and when a show leaves you with more questions than the answers after its 8

Phillip Seymour Hoffman : An Obituary

Phillip Seymour Hoffman was one of the modern acting greats. You can always identify and isolate him in an ensemble cast. Give him just two-three lines in a 150-180 minutes long feature film and still he would enthrall the audience with his magic and aura and come out on top. People and critics alike bestowed countless superlatives upon him in a career spanning over more than two decades but whether any one of those adjectives ever managed to justify his cinematic craft, I seriously doubted. He was unprecedented and unsurpassed in the practice of cinematic artistry and thus emerged as America’s greatest character actor ever, period. Paul Giamatti is his worthy successor and hopefully he would calm and soothe our nerves with his finest performances in times to come in Phillip’s absence. Phillip ultimately was a show-stealer, a rabble-rouser, an aloof but a sympathizing marvelous human being who marveled in Hollywood though always residing at its sidelines. I first saw him playing a y

Book Review: Unanswered

'Unanswered' is a book penned by Mr. Kunal Uniyal and it's his third book. I am calling it a book, using a common noun to describe it and I have a good enough reason for doing so. It's a book that consists off both poems and prose and I was in real dilemma picturing its prognosis in my mind. It started with a poem named 'You and I' and beautiful it was, all poised and lyrical. And then came a snippet of a prose by the name 'Life of a Yogi'. They were really not connected and I was perplexed. Then I allowed myself some comfort and decided to dig up some more. Some more beautiful poems and accompanying yet again not quite related passages of prose followed but now they looked more in shape and very much in order. Now I was beginning to realize that there was more to this book than met my eyes earlier and it's scope is much wider that what I originally thought. You are required to engage yourself with this book and once you do that, you will know you ar